← Catalog
skill Marketing

Brand Audit

brand-audit

Conducts brand audits evaluating consistency, perception, competitive positioning, and improvement recommendations across all touchpoints. Use when assessing brand health.

Add this skill
  1. This skill, packaged and ready to upload. brand-audit.zip
  2. In claude.ai or Claude desktop: Customize → Skills (+) → Create skill → Upload a skill, select the zip and toggle it on. Greyed out? Enable code execution under Settings → Capabilities.
  3. It’s live in your chats — no code, no setup. Want every Marketing skill at once? Add the whole plugin from the Marketing page (Customize → Personal plugins → Create plugin → Upload plugin).

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when you need to:

  • Evaluate how consistent your brand is across all touchpoints
  • Assess brand perception among customers and the market
  • Identify gaps between brand intent and brand reality
  • Create an improvement roadmap before a rebrand or refresh

DO NOT use this skill for financial audits, compliance audits, or creating new brand identity. This is for evaluating and scoring existing brand performance.


Core Principle

A BRAND AUDIT REVEALS THE GAP BETWEEN WHAT YOU THINK YOUR BRAND IS AND WHAT CUSTOMERS ACTUALLY EXPERIENCE — CLOSE THAT GAP AND YOUR BRAND GETS STRONGER.


Phase 1: Brief

Required Inputs

Input What to Ask Default
Brand "What brand are you auditing?" Must be provided
Touchpoints "List all places customers encounter your brand (website, social, email, packaging, ads, support)." Website, social media, email
Brand guidelines "Do you have documented brand guidelines?" Informal or none
Customer feedback "Any recent customer feedback, reviews, or survey data?" Will work with available
Competitors "Name 3 competitors to benchmark against." Must be provided
Trigger "Why are you doing this audit now? (rebrand, growth, inconsistency, new hire)" General health check

GATE: Confirm brief and gather access to touchpoints before proceeding.


Phase 2: Assess

Audit Framework

Evaluate across five dimensions:

1. Visual Consistency (score 1-10)

  • Logo usage across touchpoints — consistent or inconsistent?
  • Color palette adherence
  • Typography consistency
  • Image style alignment

2. Verbal Consistency (score 1-10)

  • Tone of voice across channels
  • Messaging alignment with positioning
  • Tagline and value proposition clarity

3. Customer Perception (score 1-10)

  • Review sentiment
  • Social media mentions and tone
  • Support ticket themes
  • Direct customer feedback

4. Competitive Positioning (score 1-10)

  • Differentiation clarity
  • Visual distinction from competitors
  • Messaging uniqueness

5. Brand Experience (score 1-10)

  • Customer journey consistency
  • Touchpoint quality (website speed, email design, support responsiveness)
  • Emotional impression alignment with brand intent

GATE: Present preliminary scores and key findings before building the full report.


Phase 3: Build

Deliverables

1. Brand Audit Scorecard

  • Dimension-by-dimension scoring (1-10) with overall brand health score
  • Traffic light system: green (strong), yellow (needs attention), red (urgent)
  • Comparison to competitors where applicable

2. Touchpoint-by-Touchpoint Review For each touchpoint:

  • Current state description
  • Consistency score
  • Screenshots or examples
  • Specific issues identified
  • Improvement recommendations

3. Gap Analysis

  • Brand intent vs. brand reality comparison
  • Biggest inconsistencies ranked by customer impact
  • Quick wins (fixable in 1 week) vs. strategic improvements (1-3 months)

4. Improvement Roadmap

  • Prioritized action items by impact and effort
  • Timeline: immediate fixes, 30-day improvements, 90-day strategic changes
  • Resource requirements for each action

Phase 4: Polish

Presentation Format

Structure the audit for the intended audience:

  • Founder/CEO: Executive summary + scorecard + top 5 recommendations
  • Marketing team: Full report with touchpoint details and action items
  • Design team: Visual consistency findings with specific examples to fix

Follow-Up Schedule

  • 90 days: re-score the dimensions addressed in the roadmap
  • 6 months: full audit refresh to measure progress
  • Annual: comprehensive brand audit as a recurring practice

Example 1: SaaS Company Audit

Finding: Website messaging is polished but social media uses inconsistent tone (professional on LinkedIn, overly casual on Twitter). Email templates use outdated logo. Score: 6/10 overall. Top fix: Update all email templates and create social media voice guidelines.

Example 2: E-commerce Brand Audit

Finding: Product packaging is on-brand but website photography style varies wildly across product categories. Competitor X has a more cohesive visual story. Score: 5/10 visual consistency. Top fix: Create a photography style guide and reshoot inconsistent product images.


Anti-Patterns

  • Auditing without benchmarks — a score of 7/10 means nothing without context. Compare to competitors and best-in-class examples.
  • Focusing only on visuals — brand is more than a logo. Audit verbal identity, customer experience, and perception too.
  • Audit without action plan — identifying problems without prioritized solutions is just a critique, not an audit.
  • Ignoring internal brand alignment — if employees do not understand the brand, external consistency is impossible.
  • Once and done — a single audit is a snapshot. Regular audits track progress and catch drift.

Recovery

  • No brand guidelines to audit against: Establish baseline guidelines from the best existing touchpoint and audit all others against that standard.
  • User defensive about findings: Frame issues as opportunities, not failures. Every brand has inconsistencies — the audit is the first step to fixing them.
  • Too many issues to address: Prioritize by customer impact. Fix the touchpoints customers see most often first.
  • No customer perception data: Use review sites, social mentions, and support tickets as proxies. Recommend a customer perception survey for next audit.

View source on GitHub →